BE CAREFUL WHEN “PLAYING DETECTIVE” IN ANTICIPATION OF DIVORCE
Friday, December 18th, 2009Many people contemplating divorce think they can be detectives and learn information that may help them in their divorce. It is true that being vigilant can be helpful. However, trying to spy on others can be tricky and even criminal.
Civil lawsuits are increasing dramatically because litigants in divorce and custody disputes improperly, and sometimes illegally, tape record, take information from computers or follow others improperly. Surveillance means “ a close watch kept over someone or something”. When done incorrectly, it can cause serious problems. The current state of the law regarding communications, such as, eavesdropping, acquiring computer information and stalking is evolving and often requires professional training be anyone trying to use it and stay within the law. If not properly addressed, the information obtained may not be able to be used. Even worse, serious consequences, such as fines, money damages in the thousands of dollars and refusal by the court to use the evidence, may befall the unwary.
In Michigan, federal law prohibits most eavesdropping. In Michigan state courts, eavesdropping of a person speaking by phone to another person, when the person doing the recording is not a participant, is illegal. However, one person recording a call in which they are a participant, even if the other person does not know of the recording, is not illegal.
The laws regarding what may be taken from a computer are very confusing. If it is a “family” computer that is openly accessed, then information can be culled from it. The more private the computer or the more personal the information, the closer to illegal taking the information may be. There may be many ways of obtaining the information, such as removing the hard drive for copying; “key logging” which involves software which copies and stores every keystroke, so that e-mails and other typing may be saved is also available. Most of the use of this software is illegal and will render the information inadmissible.
Certain surveillance by investigators is legal. That has not stopped those from being followed from suing for being “stalked”. Stalking must be without legitimate purpose. Licensed investigators following a person to obtain information with reference to securing information to be used in court or a board or investigating committee are allowed to do their job. However, placing electronic devices on vehicles to obtain information regarding the whereabouts of a person is usually illegal.
All in all, there is a balance which must be maintained regarding investigation versus right to privacy. When the balance is not maintained, the law is broken. Not knowing the law can cause serious problems.